Saturday, February 4, 2012

Make as little as $512 with MLM Marketing Opportunity

This is a NEW Team build and we are Currently Looking for 1st level members!
Once the First row is filled we will spill over to the next.

Here's How it Works:

Members of the team You will be given 2 downlines (1st level)
Those 2 downlines will earn you $4

Those 4 downlines you have on your 2nd level will also have 2 downlines each
on their 1st level. Giving YOU 8 downlines on your 3rd level and earning you $8

And here's the BEST part...Your earnings will not stop there because at Clixsense..
You will still EARN $1 on each downline up to your 8th level. Giving you a potential $512.00 YEARLY from this team alone.



Is $512.00 YEARLY possible?

Yes because we are using a Downline Spillover System

In this system, All Team Members will have a limit of 2 downlines at their 1st level.
So All members of the TEAM will have a chance to complete their downlines from Level 1 to Level 8.
---In short, we will build your direct downline all the way down to the 8th level! by supplying 2 new downlines all the way down!

Here is an Example:




IN the diagram. You are the figure at the top.
Now the two figures below you will each earn you $2 each ($4)
They will have two down lines each,for each of those you will earn you $1
Now those down lines will have their own pair of down lines each, multiplying your income.
-- And this continues 8 Levels Down.
2 becomes 4 which becomes 8 which becomes 16 which becomes 32 which becomes 64 which becomes 128, etc.
You get the point. The beauty of this Team is we will Do The Recruiting For You based on the order you joined!



HOW TO JOIN OUR TEAM.

1. You must have $17 on your Alertpay, Paypal or Liberty Reserve account. You can also use Google Checkout (to be used for upgrading your account in clixsense -- This is a must as it is the only way to benefit from the spill over system we will use)

2. Send RTC01 a Private message for placement in team.



Why join our team?

Simple. If you join clixsense alone, Nobody will help you to get downlines,
But if you Join our Team, we will help you to get downlines, build your network and earn up to $512 YEARLY from our team alone.

What are the benefits of joining Clixsense as an upgraded member?

1. You will earn from $1 -$2 from every referral that will upgrade.
2. You will earn $0.20 as a premium member from every first level referral that signs up and clicks 20 ads.
4. You will earn up to .01 on the clicks of your 1st level downlines.
5. You have 50 chances to win on clixgrid from $0.10 to $5.00 everyday
6. This is a yearly income because everytime You and Your downlines renew their premium membership
at clixsense for only $17, You will earn $512.00 over and over again every year.
7. Clixsense has a contest with a prize of $250(Clixsense Already announced the winner last Nov. 15, 2010)

So what are you waiting for? Remember that this is a Yearly income...
Join our team TODAY and earn $512.00 EVERY YEAR!


The sooner you join the faster you will benefit from our spillover system.

Apply Here:
http://www.emoneyspace.com/forum/index.php/topic,205790.0.html

Monday, May 16, 2011

Today's Links To Popular Websites that Pay

Monetize your life with these Currently Hot Sites:

Mr. Rebates - (Hottest site this Month) and Ebates

^Ebates and Mr Rebates are CashBack Programs that reward you for online shopping.
Vendors include Walmart and more than 2000 online stores.


Social Networks That Pay


MyLot *get paid for posting on forums

People String *social network


--Search Engines That Pay


SwagBucks *earn free stuff just for browsing with their search engine

Irazoo *Alternative to Swagbucks


Web Hosts That Pay


Squidoo *web host splits share of income

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Google uncloaks once-secret server

Stephen Shankland/CNET)

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.--Google is tight-lipped about its computing operations, but the company for the first time on Wednesday revealed the hardware at the core of its Internet might at a conference here about the increasingly prominent issue of data center efficiency.

Most companies buy servers from the likes of Dell, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, or Sun Microsystems. But Google, which has hundreds of thousands of servers and considers running them part of its core expertise, designs and builds its own. Ben Jai, who designed many of Google's servers, unveiled a modern Google server before the hungry eyes of a technically sophisticated audience.
Google server designer Ben Jai



Google's big surprise: each server has its own 12-volt battery to supply power if there's a problem with the main source of electricity. The company also revealed for the first time that since 2005, its data centers have been composed of standard shipping containers--each with 1,160 servers and a power consumption that can reach 250 kilowatts.

It may sound geeky, but a number of attendees--the kind of folks who run data centers packed with thousands of servers for a living--were surprised not only by Google's built-in battery approach, but by the fact that the company has kept it secret for years. Jai said in an interview that Google has been using the design since 2005 and now is in its sixth or seventh generation of design.

"It was our Manhattan Project," Jai said of the design.

Google has an obsessive focus on energy efficiency and now is sharing more of its experience with the world. With the recession pressuring operations budgets, environmental concerns waxing, and energy prices and constraints increasing, the time is ripe for Google to do more efficiency evangelism, said Urs Hoelzle, Google's vice president of operations.

"There wasn't much benefit in trying to preach if people weren't interested in it," said Hoelzle, but now attitudes have changed.

The company also focuses on data center issues such as power distribution, cooling, and ensuring hot and cool air don't intermingle, said Chris Malone, who's involved in the data center design and efficiency measurement. Google's data centers now have reached efficiency levels that the Environmental Protection Agency hopes will be attainable in 2011 using advanced technology.

"We've achieved this now by application of best practices and some innovations--nothing really inaccessible to the rest of the market," Malone said.
The rear side of Google's server.



Why built-in batteries?
Why is the battery approach significant? Money.

Typical data centers rely on large, centralized machines called uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)--essentially giant batteries that kick in when the main supply fails and before generators have time to kick in. Building the power supply into the server is cheaper and means costs are matched directly to the number of servers, Jai said.

"This is much cheaper than huge centralized UPS," he said. "Therefore no wasted capacity."

Efficiency is another financial factor. Large UPSs can reach 92 to 95 percent efficiency, meaning that a large amount of power is squandered. The server-mounted batteries do better, Jai said: "We were able to measure our actual usage to greater than 99.9 percent efficiency."
Urs Hoelzle, Google's vice president of operations



The Google server was 3.5 inches thick--2U, or 2 rack units, in data center parlance. It had two processors, two hard drives, and eight memory slots mounted on a motherboard built by Gigabyte. Google uses x86 processors from both AMD and Intel, Jai said, and Google uses the battery design on its network equipment, too.

Efficiency is important not just because improving it cuts power consumption costs, but also because inefficiencies typically produce waste heat that requires yet more expense in cooling.

Costs add up
Google operates servers at a tremendous scale, and these costs add up quickly.

Jai has borne a lot of the burden himself. He was the only electrical engineer on the server design job from 2003 to 2005, he said. "I worked 14-hour days for two and a half years," he said, before more employees were hired to share the work.

Google has patents on the built-in battery design, "but I think we'd be willing to license them to vendors," Hoelzle said.

Another illustration of Google's obsession with efficiency comes through power supply design. Power supplies convert conventional AC (alternating current--what you get from a wall socket) electricity into the DC (direct current--what you get from a battery) electricity, and typical power supplies provide computers with both 5-volt and 12-volt DC power. Google's designs supply only 12-volt power, with the necessary conversions taking place on the motherboard.
Google's data center efficiency has been improving gradually.



That adds $1 or $2 to the cost of the motherboard, but it's worth it not just because the power supply is cheaper, but because the power supply can be run closer to its peak capacity, which means it runs much more efficiently. Google even pays attention to the greater efficiency of transmitting power over copper wires at 12 volts compared to 5 volts.

Google also revealed new performance results for data center energy efficiency measured by a standard called power usage effectiveness. PUE, developed by a consortium called the Green Grid, measures how much power goes directly to computing compared to ancillary services such as lighting and cooling. A perfect score of 1 means no power goes to the extra costs; 1.5 means that ancillary services consume half the power devoted to computing.

Google's PUE scores are enviably low, but the company is working to lower them further. In the third quarter of 2008, Google's PUE was 1.21, but it dropped to 1.20 for the fourth quarter and to 1.19 for the first quarter of 2009 through March 15, Malone said.

Older Google facilities generally have higher PUEs, he said; the best has a score of 1.12. When the weather gets warmer, Google notices is that it's harder to keep servers cool.
An excerpt from a video tour Google presented of its data center containers. Like conventional data centers, Google's shipping containers have raised floors.



Shipping containers
Most people buy computers one at a time, but Google thinks on a very different scale. Jimmy Clidaras revealed that the core of the company's data centers are composed of standard 1AAA shipping containers packed with 1,160 servers each, with many containers in each data center.

Modular data centers are not unique to Google; Sun Microsystems and Rackable Systems both sell them. But Google started using them in 2005.

Google's first experiments had some rough patches, though, Clidaras said--for example when they found the first crane they used wasn't big enough to actually lift one.

Overall, Google's choices have been driven by a broad analysis on cost that encompasses software, hardware, and facilities.

"Early on, there was an emphasis on the dollar per (search) query," Hoelzle said. "We were forced to focus. Revenue per query is very low."

Mainstream servers with x86 processors were the only option, he added. "Ten years ago...it was clear the only way to make (search) work as free product was to run on relatively cheap hardware. You can't run it on a mainframe. The margins just don't work out," he said.

Operating at Google's scale has its challenges, but it also has its silver linings. For example, a given investment on research can be applied to a larger amount of infrastructure, yielding return faster, Hoelzle said.

Read more and view the design: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10209580-92.html

Facebook Has Over 30,000 Servers

October 13th, 2009 : By Rich Miller


How many servers does Facebook have? For some time now, the stock answer has been “more than 10,000 servers,” a number the company began using in April 2008. Facebook has continued to use that number, even as it has soared past 300 million users and dramatically expanded its data center space.

We now have an update: Facebook has 30,000 servers supporting its operations. That number comes from Jeff Rothschild, the vice president of technology at Facebook, who discussed the company’s infrastructure in a presentation last week at UC San Diego (link via High Scalability).

“Today we have somewhere in the neighborhood of 30,000 servers,” Rothschild said during the Q&A session following his talk, adding that the number ”will be different today than it was yesterday” because Facebook is adding capacity on a daily basis.

That places Facebook among the largest Internet companies that have publicly discussed their server counts, but still well behind hosting providers Rackspace, 1&1 Internet and OVH, which each house more than 50,000 servers in their data centers. See Who Has The Most Web Servers for more date on the largest infrastructures.

20,000 Servers In 18 Months
It also suggests that Facebook has added about 20,000 servers since early 2008, which explains why it borrowed $100 million in May 2008 to fund server purchases.

Rothschild also shared some huge numbers associated with Facebook’s photo storage operation, which now stores 80 billion images (20 billion images, each in four sizes). Rothschild said the real challenge isn’t storage, but delivery. ”We serve up 600,000 photos a second,” he said.

25 Terabytes of Log Data – Daily
The amount of log data amassed in Facebook’s operations is staggering. Rothschild said Facebook manages more than 25 terabytes of data per day in logging data, which he said was the equivalent of about 1,000 times the volume of mail delivered daily by the U.S. Postal Service.

Rothschild also discussed the effectiveness of the company’s engineering operations. Facebook currently has about 230 engineers on staff, who manage data for more than 300 million users. Rothschild said that having one engineer for more than 1 million active users has been a consistent historic ratio at Facebook. ”We believe engineers at Facebook have a dramatic impact.”

The 1-hour, 10-minute presentation discusses the company’s commitment to open source technologies and the importance of memcached and Hadoop in their operations.

Source: http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/13/facebook-now-has-30000-servers/

Friday, January 21, 2011

Review on the new casting of The Dark Knight Rises

From: William Sidney, Yahoo! Contributor Network.

If there's one thing that Batman fans love to hate, it's references to the crappy acting that marked the last Batman film before uber-director
Christopher Nolan took the reins. The recent news that Christopher Nolan had cast Tom Hardy, for the part of Bane took everyone by surprise, perhaps not so much with Tom Hardy being cast for the part, but that Bane would be included in the movie. With the 2012 release of "The Dark Knight Rises," there is a strong sense of faith among those who had initially questioned some of the casting in the previous Batman movies, in particular the casting of Heath Ledger as Joker. Those critics have long since eaten their words, and are taking Nolan's word on faith this time around for the part of Bane, particularly as Tom Hardy has worked previously with Christopher Nolan in his last movie, "Inception."

Tom Hardy as Bane

Bane has ever been the Batman\'s ultimate rival- perhaps there might be discussion among the comic book faithful, but clearly, there have been few images that quite rival the scene in which Bane breaks the Batman's back. Perhaps the death of Superman comes close- any thoughts? (comments are welcome below) Given that this is purported to be both Christopher Nolan and Christian Bale's final tour in the Batman franchise, that begs the question as to whether the iconic destruction of Batman at the hands of Bane and Tom Hardy will in fact take place in this third film of the Batman Reboot.

While there's plenty of faith in Tom Hardy and his ability to play Bane, there are, In fact, several other questions being asked about this movie that don't quite add up. One, that two principals at least will not be returning to their parts again, the director and star. Two, that a major character such as Selina Kyle is being introduced, but may or may not be portraying the part of "Catwoman," and three, that at least 99% of the Batman fans out there are literally afraid of what any other director might be tempted to do with the series from here.

Thursday, January 20, 2011

CEO or the Customer: Who is Your Master?

From: Saleslaundry Blog
April 29th, 2009 | Author: Val

Who do we really serve in our businesses?

A current trend in sales organization design is to be customer centric. The customer centric sales model puts the customer at the center of the sales process in an effort to align customers’ needs and buying preferences with the way we design our sales tools and create value.

Add this to our “quality customer service” initiatives, “the customer is always right” statements, and customer service surveys that were once rare, but now seem to have attached themselves via URL to the bottom of every major grocer, retailer and restaurant chain’s receipts in recent memory.

All of this makes sense to me, especially today when it has become clear the power of knowledge once wielded by sales teams has shifted decidedly in favor of the customer researching via the Internet. Coupled with that, customers continue to benefit from splintered product categories offering more product choices, wider selections, and more competitors fighting for dollars.



On this information alone I would have declared the customer “King”, but then I saw this:







It looks to me like to a large extent our Employees are serving our Supervisors who are serving our Middle Managers who are serving our Vice Presidents, who are serving the CEO, who is presumably serving the Board and the shareholders/investors. The remarkable part is, by design, either everyone has their back to the customer or the customer is actually supposed to serve the company!

If customers are truly our focus, or as a corollary, if we should focus on serving our employees so that they will serve our customers, shouldn’t the model look more like this?







With this model, the CEO serves his customers, the Vice Presidents, who are in turn serving the Middle Managers, serving Supervisors who are focused on the health and wellbeing of the Employees so they can give their undivided attention to serving the Customer.

It was wisely said a long time ago that a man cannot serve two masters. So who do you serve?

Are we serving the management team that writes our checks or the people that give the management team the money to make sure our checks don’t bounce?

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Hotmail Passwords Leak

Details of a Hotmail security breach emerged early yesterday, with approximately at least 10,000 confirmed accounts having been compromised.

While the exact number of accounts has not yet been confirmed, the breach was likely the result of a phishing campaign -- a different kind of hack that uses fake web pages in order to acquire all kinds of sensitive information, from login data and passwords (such as in this case) to credit card and social security numbers. (Source: cnet.com)

"We determined that this was not a breach of internal Microsoft data and initiated our standard process of working to help customers regain control of their accounts," said a Microsoft representative through email to Computerworld. (Source: computerworld.com)

"Over the weekend Microsoft learned that several thousand Windows Live Hotmail customers' credentials were exposed on a third-party site due to a likely phishing scheme," the spokesperson admitted.


Update: Microsoft blocked access to all accounts that were listed as compromised. So for all those worried if their account was on the exposed list. If you were able to login normally with your account then your login details weren't exposed. I would recommend everyone to change their passwords after logging in in the case that there were more accounts compromised that weren't listed.